Court Enjoins Post-Dispatch; 2d Article on Study Withheld
Date: 27 June 1971
St Louis Post-Dispatch repts it has been enjoined by Fed Ct from further publication of article based on study; 1st article quoted McNamara memo on various aspects of war
Dipendra Bir Bikram Shah Dev (Catmandu, 27 de junho de 1971 – Catmandu, 4 de junho de 2001) foi rei do Nepal por apenas três dias, de 1 a 4 de junho de 2001, enquanto estava em coma no hospital. Se tornou chefe-de-estado após matar seu pai, o rei Birendra, e ficar mortalmente ferido num tiro suicida, no que ficou conhecido como o Massacre da Família Real do Nepal. Faria 30 anos apenas 23 dias depois de morrer.
Leia mais...O dia 27 de junho de 1971 foi um domingo sob o signo de ♋. Foi o dia 177 do ano. O presidente dos Estados Unidos foi Richard M. Nixon.
Se você nasceu neste dia, você tem 54 anos de idade. Seu último aniversário foi no dia sexta-feira, 27 de junho de 2025, 129 dias atrás. Seu próximo aniversário é no dia sábado, 27 de junho de 2026, em 235 dias. Você viveu 19.853 dias, ou cerca de 476.484 horas, ou cerca de 28.589.043 minutos, ou cerca de 1.715.342.580 segundos.
Date: 27 June 1971
St Louis Post-Dispatch repts it has been enjoined by Fed Ct from further publication of article based on study; 1st article quoted McNamara memo on various aspects of war
Date: 27 June 1971
By FRED P. GRAHAM
Fred GRAHAM
comment on case before US Sup Ct; caricature
Date: 28 June 1971
By JOHN L. HESSSpecial to The New York Times
John HESSSpecial
article on phenomenon of proliferating 'underground press' in W Eur; illus
Date: 27 June 1971
Knight press article repts that study documents show that US mil leaders were putting pressure on Johnson to expand war into Laos, Cambodia and N Vietnam in '66 and '67
Date: 28 June 1971
By ROGER HILSMAN
Roger HILSMAN
R Hilsman lauds Times publication of study documents; says natl security is not endangered; sees bias in study because authors of analyses in study were members of Johnson Adm
Date: 27 June 1971
Special to The New York Times
transcript of oral argument in Times and Washington Post cases before the Sup Ct
Date: 27 June 1971
lrs by G Pressman and others on Pentagon study issue
Date: 27 June 1971
By ROBERT M. SMITHSpecial to The New York Times
Ellsberg lawyers Profs C R Nesson and L B Boudin say Ellsberg will give himself up in Boston to the Fed Govt on the morning of June 28; do not disclose his whereabouts; Boudin gives reasons for Ellsberg not turning himself in during a weekend; says a ruling by Sup Ct favorable to The Times may 'very well dispose of many of the issues presented in our case' since major consideration is whether or not study consists of natl defense documents; lawyers say that even if everything charged against Ellsworth is true, there has been no crime committed
Date: 28 June 1971
By CHRISTOPHER LYDONSpecial to The New York Times
Sup Ct decision awaited; FBI presses its search for Ellsberg; Sen McGovern say study reveals crimes of deception by Govt officials more serious than any violations of security classification involved in its release; Very Rev F B Sayre scores deception and 'abuse of truth' by 'my friends'; Newsweek repts Gallup Poll shows majority of Amer opinion disapproves of Govt effort at suppression; G W Ball says study should be published but cautions against the search for villains or heroes in it, TV int; seems to agree with Ellsberg warning that Nixon Adm now stands at another critical turning point of Vietnam policy; justifies his own pub advocacy of the official view of the war in '66, contrary to his private opposition to expansion of the war he was presenting to Govt's inner councils; says this is 'exactly what any Govt official must necessarily do if there is to be orderly govt'; does not think study presents a security issue; Time magazine repts Rusk warned Pres Kennedy in '61 not to send 8,000 US troops into Vietnam as Taylor was advocating at the time
Date: 27 June 1971
By TOM WICKER
Tom WICKER
T Wicker justifies Times pub of Pentagon documents; says that argument most frequently advanced by those who question Times's decisions to pub documents rests on 2 fallacious assumptions that 'natl interest' and 'natl security' are synonymous and that only most experienced, skilled and informed Govt officials know best; notes that Govt does not necessarily have best information, that it can have preconceived policy convictions despite contrary facts, and that it always has its own pol self-interest to consider